User talk:Dleangen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? | How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? | ||
--[[User:Paul.bijnens|Paul.bijnens]] 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST) | --[[User:Paul.bijnens|Paul.bijnens]] 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST) | ||
---- | |||
Well, it doesn't, actually. I never even heard about that until you mentioned it. | Well, it doesn't, actually. I never even heard about that until you mentioned it. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
So, I guess I'll forge ahead, but I'll try to check out the module at some point. | So, I guess I'll forge ahead, but I'll try to check out the module at some point. | ||
--[[User:David.Leangen|David.Leangen]] 22:07, 7 December 2005 (JST) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 7 December 2005
How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? --Paul.bijnens 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST)
Well, it doesn't, actually. I never even heard about that until you mentioned it.
As Paul Bijnens wrote on the list:
A description of a configuration without that kernel module is still handy too. There were bugs in several versions of that kernel module making it unusable. And some people could base their settings of a non iptables firewall (FW1 etc) on this description.
So, I guess I'll forge ahead, but I'll try to check out the module at some point. --David.Leangen 22:07, 7 December 2005 (JST)