Talk:Not an amanda tape: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul.bijnens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Paul.bijnens (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Why does `amcheck' claim that the tape is `not an amanda tape'? moved to Talk:Amcheck: not an amanda tape) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:51, 9 December 2005
I'm not convinced that using a rewinding tapedevice makes the tape label invalid. Anyone proof of this solution? On the other hand, a wrong blocksize (32 bytes instead of 32k bytes) can result in an invalid label. -- Paul.bijnens 11:36, 5 December 2005 (PST)