Talk:Not an amanda tape: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul.bijnens (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Why does `amcheck' claim that the tape is `not an amanda tape'? moved to Talk:Amcheck: not an amanda tape) |
m (Talk:Amcheck: not an amanda tape moved to Talk:Not an amanda tape: remove prefix) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 22:26, 6 April 2007
I'm not convinced that using a rewinding tapedevice makes the tape label invalid. Anyone proof of this solution? On the other hand, a wrong blocksize (32 bytes instead of 32k bytes) can result in an invalid label. -- Paul.bijnens 11:36, 5 December 2005 (PST)