User talk:Dleangen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul.bijnens (talk | contribs) (ip_conntrack_amanda ?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? | How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? | ||
--[[User:Paul.bijnens|Paul.bijnens]] 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST) | --[[User:Paul.bijnens|Paul.bijnens]] 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST) | ||
Well, it doesn't, actually. I never even heard about that until you mentioned it. | |||
As Paul Bijnens wrote on the list: | |||
A description of a configuration without that kernel | |||
module is still handy too. There were bugs in several | |||
versions of that kernel module making it unusable. | |||
And some people could base their settings of a non | |||
iptables firewall (FW1 etc) on this description. | |||
So, I guess I'll forge ahead, but I'll try to check out the module at some point. | |||
Revision as of 13:05, 7 December 2005
How does the iptables kernel module "ip_conntrack_amanda" fit in this scheme? --Paul.bijnens 14:49, 6 December 2005 (PST)
Well, it doesn't, actually. I never even heard about that until you mentioned it.
As Paul Bijnens wrote on the list:
A description of a configuration without that kernel module is still handy too. There were bugs in several versions of that kernel module making it unusable. And some people could base their settings of a non iptables firewall (FW1 etc) on this description.
So, I guess I'll forge ahead, but I'll try to check out the module at some point.